Higher Work of Breathing During Exercise in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown if pulmonary alterations in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) impact respiratory mechanics during exercise. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are the operating lung volumes, work of breathing (Wb), and power of breathing (Pb) abnormal in patients with HFpEF during exercise? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with HFpEF (n = 8; median age, 71 years [interquartile range (IQR), 66-80 years]) and control participants (n = 9; median age, 68 years [IQR, 64-74 years]) performed incremental cycling to volitional exhaustion. Esophageal pressure, end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), inspiratory lung volume (EILV), and ventilatory variables were compared at similar absolute (30 and 50 L/min) and relative (45% of peak, 70% of peak, and 100% of peak) minute ventilation (V.E) during exercise. RESULTS: During exercise, EELVs were not different between patients with HFpEF and control participants (P > .13 for all). EILVs were lower in patients with HFpEF than control participants at 45% and 70% V.E peak (P < .03 for all). Dynamic lung compliance was lower in patients with HFpEF than control participants at 30 L/min, 50 L/min, 45% V.E peak, and 100% V.E peak (P < .04 for all). Compared with control participants, patients with HFpEF showed higher total Wb and Pb at 30 L/min (Wb: median, 1.08 J/L [IQR, 0.93-1.82 J/L] vs 0.52 J/L [IQR, 0.43-0.71 J/L]; Pb: median, 36 J/min [IQR, 30-59 J/min] vs 17 J/min [IQR, 11-23 J/min] and 50 L/min; Wb: median, 1.40 J/L [IQR, 1.27-1.68 J/L] vs 0.90 J/L [IQR, 0.74-1.05 J/L]; Pb: median, 73 J/min [IQR, 60-83 J/min] vs 45 J/min [IQR, 33-63 J/min]; P < .01 for all). At 30 and 50 L/min, inspiratory and expiratory resistive Wb and Pb were higher in patients with HFpEF than control participants (P < .04 for all). Total Wb was higher for patients with HFpEF than control participants at 45% of V.E peak (P = .02). Total Pb was higher for control participants than patients with HFpEF at 100% V.E peak because of higher inspiratory resistive Pb (P < .04 for both). INTERPRETATION: These data demonstrate the HFpEF syndrome is associated with pulmonary alterations eliciting a greater Pb during exercise resulting from greater inspiratory and expiratory resistive Pb.

Inspiratory and leg muscle blood flows during inspiratory muscle metaboreflex activation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The purpose of this study was to determine the cardiovascular consequences elicited by activation of the inspiratory muscle metaboreflex in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and controls. Patients with HFpEF (n = 15; 69 ± 10 yr; 33 ± 4 kg/m2) and controls (n = 14; 70 ± 8 yr; 28 ± 4 kg/m2) performed an inspiratory loading trial at 60% maximal inspiratory pressure (PIMAX) until task failure. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured continuously. Near-infrared spectroscopy and bolus injections of indocyanine green dye were used to determine the percent change in blood flow index (%ΔBFI) from baseline to the final minute of inspiratory loading in the vastus lateralis and sternocleidomastoid muscles. Vascular resistance index (VRI) was calculated. Time to task failure was shorter in HFpEF than in controls (339 ± 197 s vs. 626 ± 403 s; P = 0.02). Compared with controls, patients with HFpEF had a greater increase from baseline in MAP (16 ± 7 vs. 10 ± 6 mmHg) and vastus lateralis VRI (76 ± 45 vs. 32 ± 19%) as well as a greater decrease in vastus lateralis %ΔBFI (-32 ± 14 vs. -17 ± 9%) (all, P < 0.05). Sternocleidomastoid %ΔBFI normalized to absolute inspiratory pressure was higher in HFpEF compared with controls (8.0 ± 5.0 vs. 4.0 ± 1.9% per cmH2O·s; P = 0.03). These data indicate that patients with HFpEF exhibit exaggerated cardiovascular responses with inspiratory muscle metaboreflex activation compared with controls.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Respiratory muscle dysfunction is thought to contribute to exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); however, the underlying mechanisms are unknown. In the present study, patients with HFpEF had greater increases in leg muscle vascular resistance index and greater decreases in leg muscle blood flow index compared with controls during inspiratory resistive breathing (to activate the metaboreflex). Furthermore, respiratory muscle blood flow index responses normalized to pressure generation during inspiratory resistive breathing were exaggerated in HFpEF compared with controls.

Combined influence of inspiratory loading and locomotor subsystolic cuff inflation on cardiovascular responses during submaximal exercise.

It is unknown if simultaneous stimulation of the respiratory and locomotor muscle afferents via inspiratory loading (IL) and locomotor subsystolic cuff inflation (CUFF) influences the cardiovascular responses during exercise. We hypothesized that combined IL and CUFF (IL + CUFF) will result in greater increases in blood pressure (MAP) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) than IL and CUFF alone during exercise. Eight adults (6 males/2 females) were enrolled and performed four 10-min bouts of constant-load cycling eliciting 40% maximal oxygen uptake on a single day. For each exercise bout, the first 5 min consisted of spontaneous breathing. The second 5 min consisted of voluntary hyperventilation (i.e., breathing frequency of 40 breaths/min) with IL (30% maximum inspiratory pressure), CUFF (80 mmHg), IL + CUFF, or no intervention (CTL) in randomized order. During exercise, cardiac output and MAP were determined via open-circuit acetylene wash-in and manual sphygmomanometry, respectively, and SVR was calculated. Across CTL, IL, CUFF, and IL + CUFF, MAP was greater with each condition (CTL: 97 ± 14; IL: 106 ± 13; CUFF: 114 ± 14; IL + CUFF: 119 ± 15 mmHg, all P < 0.02). Furthermore, SVR was greater with IL + CUFF compared with IL, CUFF, and CTL (CTL: 6.6 ± 1.1; IL: 7.5 ± 1.4; CUFF: 7.5 ± 1.3; IL + CUFF: 8.2 ± 1.4 mmHg·L-1·min-1, all P < 0.02). Cardiac output was not different across conditions (CTL: 15.2 ± 3.8; IL: 14.8 ± 3.7; CUFF: 15.6 ± 3.5; IL + CUFF: 14.7 ± 4.3 L/min, all P > 0.05). These data demonstrate that simultaneous stimulation of respiratory and locomotor muscle afferent feedback results in additive MAP and SVR responses than IL and CUFF alone during submaximal exercise. These findings have important clinical implications for populations with exaggerated locomotor and respiratory muscle reflex feedbacks.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Reflexes arising from the respiratory and locomotor muscles influence cardiovascular regulation during exercise. However, it is unclear how the respiratory and locomotor muscle reflexes interact when simultaneously stimulated. Herein, we demonstrate that stimulation of the respiratory and locomotor muscle reflexes yielded additive cardiovascular responses during submaximal exercise.